Recruitment Consultancies
ASDA deal not model solution
ARC challenges AWR
Social Media Networking as a tool
Employment status case law update
Umbrella problems damage reputation
Umbrella Company Problems
Limited companies within AWD Regulations
ARC reports on the Agency Workers Directive Part 2
Company opt outs to be retained - 12/11/09
ARC wins gold plating argument
2nd Consultation is Published - First impressions
Delay to Agency Workers Directive a welcome first
Fines imposed for Anti-Competitive activities
HMRC announces clampdown on expenses - 05/10/2009
Departing employees? - protecting client relations
“Vulnerable” Workers Helpline
Periods of sick leave and annual leave coinciding
Can you supply to replace workers on strike?
'Last in first out' redundancies
Need for a forensic approach to the AWD
Brown bows to union pressure at the TUC conference
HR set to hire direct - 16/09/2009
Seminar - Agency Workers Directive Second Consulta
Holiday pay decision
Planned increased in the national minimum wage
Employment status
ARC membership quadruples with legislation message
Construction industry
Swine flu and sickness absence
AWD threatens temp to perm fees
Government massively gold plating AWD says IoD and
More on the Agency Workers Directive
ARC exposes Agency Worker Directive.
ARC takes lead on Agency Workers Directive
Lawspeed to hold seminars on the AWD
Lawspeed seminar - Agency Workers Directive First
Consultation on Agency Workers Directive published
Lawspeed launches membership organisation
Government announces consultation - March '09
European Parliament votes to get rid of opt-out -
Pre budget report allows employment umbrellas off
Formation of Representative Group - expenses consu
Government announces yet more measures - this time
Agency Workers Directive - sleepwalk to disaster?
EU Council reaches agreement on principles of Agen
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights - May '08
Employment status and increased rights for agency
Changes to Conduct Regulations & Agency Standards
Case partially clarifies agency worker employment
HMRC Drops MSC Audit Scheme - December '07
Who could be an MSCP? - December '07
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights
HMRC has clarified its current position in relatio
MSC approval schemes update - September '07
MSC Legislation - Further Guidance - September 07
MSC Legislation - Finance Bill Passed - August '07
MSC Legislation Update. May '07
Budget Note - MSC Legislation Changes March '07
08/02/07 - 3rd party debt provisions released
Lawspeed meets Treasury re: MSC Consultation - Jan
Government announces consultation "Tackling Manage
HMRC announces start of a review of the concession
Extending paid holiday entitlement. July '06
Good news on employment status. May '06
Employment Status - Cable & Wireless Court of App
Employment status – where are we now? October '05
When is an agency worker an employee? July '05
Cable & Wireless v Muscat – Agency Clients Respond
End User held to be the employer of agency worker
Brook Street case opens door for tribunal claims J
New EAT case poses danger February '03
DTI's employment status review
EU agency workers directive
Working time and holiday pay
Risk management and insurance
Employment rights for contractors
Agency regulations - the way forward
Press > Recruitment Consultancies

ARC takes lead on Agency Workers Directive

Printer friendly version

ARC Leads Challenge to Agency Worker Rights after Just 12 Weeks

TUESDAY 2nd JUNE 2009


Plans to give all agency workers the same rights as permanent staff after just 12 weeks should be dropped, said the newly formed Association of Recruitment Consultancies (ARC) today (2nd June). The Association is warning that forcing through such measures would undermine the UK's ability to keep ahead of its competitors and discourage employers from taking on new staff, vital to help keep the economy moving.

ARC is calling for a new two-tier system that would let 'vulnerable' agency workers keep those rights after 12 weeks, but provide a much longer period for workers who don't fall into that category. The plan is aimed at protecting those workers that are more likely to be subject to exploitation, but recognises that many companies employ agency staff over longer periods to work on complex projects. Typically these staff earn higher salaries working in IT, financial management, legal work etc and do not need the protection of the 12-week period.

ARC's proposal has won support from a number of organisations including the Institute of Directors representing some 50,000 directors and the Federation of Small Businesses that represents 250,000 businesses.

Adrian Marlowe, chairman of ARC, said:

"The purpose of the Agency Worker's Directive is quite rightly to provide proper protection to those agency worker's that are seen as 'vulnerable'. Unfortunately, the agreement does not distinguish between 'vulnerable' and other workers, with the result that equal rights will apply to all after 12 weeks have passed."

"If the country is to keep ahead of its competitors and encourage hirers to use temporary staff, we must protect the recruitment supply industry from unnecessary damage and help preserve flexibility in the economy."

"A broad sweep of 12 weeks applying to all is insufficient to protect the staffing industry and will suppress agency work. Why not create a distinction that protects lower paid 'vulnerable' agency workers so that they achieve the rights at 12 weeks, whilst providing for a much longer derogation period for those that are in a stronger position?"

The two tier system benefits from real simplicity - it provides appropriate protection for those that need it at the lower end of the pay scale but, by taking out 'non-vulnerable' workers, avoids the damage which is of genuine concern to many in the industry.

Adrian Marlowe went on to say:

"The 12 weeks agreed by the CBI and TUC in May last year took the recruitment industry by surprise. The idea that it is a done deal and not open to review is simply not correct, and this should be part of the current discussions. ARC has gained widespread backing for our plan. We have written to the CBI and BERR to open urgent discussions, and we need action now, before the new legislation comes into force. "

The European Directive permits the concept of a split derogation period, as long as adequate protection is provided for agency workers. ARC's proposal is for a longer derogation period of 12 months for all workers not deemed 'vulnerable'. This fairer system would use a low multiplier of National Minimum Wage, e.g. 1.5 times. The result would be a split of 12 weeks for 'vulnerables' and 12 months for 'non-vulnerables'.

Adrian said:

"Our idea did not exist before the CBI/TUC deal was reached and it therefore makes sense to consider it now before it is too late. Many elements of the government proposals are complex and could be riddled with unintended consequences. Any measure that helps protect the recruitment industry as a whole, along the lines we suggest, must be a good thing."

"This proposal maintains the underlying balance that the government is looking for. It ensures that the economy and recruitment industry is not damaged, at the same time as giving protection to workers who may be susceptible to exploitation, which is what the unions wanted. A win, win situation."


For more information on ARC and its proactive strategy in relation to agency work please call 01273 236236. Also see www.arc-org.net.

Back to the top
Printer friendly version