Recruitment Consultancies
ASDA deal not model solution
ARC challenges AWR
Social Media Networking as a tool
Employment status case law update
Umbrella problems damage reputation
Umbrella Company Problems
Limited companies within AWD Regulations
ARC reports on the Agency Workers Directive Part 2
Company opt outs to be retained - 12/11/09
ARC wins gold plating argument
2nd Consultation is Published - First impressions
Delay to Agency Workers Directive a welcome first
Fines imposed for Anti-Competitive activities
HMRC announces clampdown on expenses - 05/10/2009
Departing employees? - protecting client relations
“Vulnerable” Workers Helpline
Periods of sick leave and annual leave coinciding
Can you supply to replace workers on strike?
'Last in first out' redundancies
Need for a forensic approach to the AWD
Brown bows to union pressure at the TUC conference
HR set to hire direct - 16/09/2009
Seminar - Agency Workers Directive Second Consulta
Holiday pay decision
Planned increased in the national minimum wage
Employment status
ARC membership quadruples with legislation message
Construction industry
Swine flu and sickness absence
AWD threatens temp to perm fees
Government massively gold plating AWD says IoD and
More on the Agency Workers Directive
ARC exposes Agency Worker Directive.
ARC takes lead on Agency Workers Directive
Lawspeed to hold seminars on the AWD
Lawspeed seminar - Agency Workers Directive First
Consultation on Agency Workers Directive published
Lawspeed launches membership organisation
Government announces consultation - March '09
European Parliament votes to get rid of opt-out -
Pre budget report allows employment umbrellas off
Formation of Representative Group - expenses consu
Government announces yet more measures - this time
Agency Workers Directive - sleepwalk to disaster?
EU Council reaches agreement on principles of Agen
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights - May '08
Employment status and increased rights for agency
Changes to Conduct Regulations & Agency Standards
Case partially clarifies agency worker employment
HMRC Drops MSC Audit Scheme - December '07
Who could be an MSCP? - December '07
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights
HMRC has clarified its current position in relatio
MSC approval schemes update - September '07
MSC Legislation - Further Guidance - September 07
MSC Legislation - Finance Bill Passed - August '07
MSC Legislation Update. May '07
Budget Note - MSC Legislation Changes March '07
08/02/07 - 3rd party debt provisions released
Lawspeed meets Treasury re: MSC Consultation - Jan
Government announces consultation "Tackling Manage
HMRC announces start of a review of the concession
Extending paid holiday entitlement. July '06
Good news on employment status. May '06
Employment Status - Cable & Wireless Court of App
Employment status – where are we now? October '05
When is an agency worker an employee? July '05
Cable & Wireless v Muscat – Agency Clients Respond
End User held to be the employer of agency worker
Brook Street case opens door for tribunal claims J
New EAT case poses danger February '03
DTI's employment status review
EU agency workers directive
Working time and holiday pay
Risk management and insurance
Employment rights for contractors
Agency regulations - the way forward
Press > Recruitment Consultancies

Fines imposed for Anti-Competitive activities

Printer friendly version

08/10/2009

£173 million in fines for anti-competitive recruiters

As has been seen in the recent case involving the massive fines imposed on a consortium of recruitment businesses called " the Construction Industry Forum”, the penalties for engaging in anti competitive behaviour can be severe . Apart from fines, they can extend in certain circumstances to the disqualification of directors. So what effect could this have on your business?

Most of you may not even consider the implications of competition law in your daily business.  However UK competition law is drafted widely, with any agreement between businesses that may have an effect on trade or that may prevent, restrict or distort competition within the UK being prohibited.  Whilst clearly, the establishment of a “cartel like” forum specific to a certain industry or sector as in this case may well ring “anti competitive” bells, less obvious arrangements could also attract attention from the authorities.

Consortiums, joint ventures

If you are part of a consortium or are considering entering a join venture, it is unlikely that you will actively be going out to undercut rivals, or carve up markets or sectors, however due to the wide drafting of competition law, other more subtle arrangements could have an effect on the market.  For example, discussing margins, potential tenders, arrangements with clients or sharing other information may result in anti competitive behaviour even where this was not the intention in the first place and may result in investigation. 

What about your staff?

It is possible that you could face liability as a result of the actions of your individual consultants if they engage in “cartel like” activity off their own backs which may be tempting particularly where there are master vendors or other managed service providers involved in the supply to a particular client.  Even if you are not aware that this is occurring, you may still be liable to investigation and potentially heavy fines.

What can you do?

It may sound obvious, but don’t enter into arrangements with your competitors to, for example, supply to a particular client, or agree not to deal with a different competitor or make plans to keep potential new competitors from entering the market.  Whilst at the time these may appear to be shrewd business decisions with great commercial benefits to your company, given the interest in the current case you may find yourself at the centre of an investigation which may be administratively burdensome and damaging to your reputation and client relationships. Any such arrangement should always be subject to specialist competition law advice, but as a general rule you should ensure that any business relationship is entered into independently and objectively.

You may want to consider if your consultants are entering into arrangements with consultants employed by your competitors – should all contracts be agreed through senior managers, should they be reviewed regularly.  Having a simple process like this in place and suitable training in respect of the potential dangers of an investigation and those anti-competitive activities that could have an impact on the business may make all the difference in respect of any investigation.

If you would like any further information or advice on your arrangements with your clients or for more information about Lawspeed’s innovative “Consultant Manager” system to streamline your processes and assist with compliance, CALL US NOW ON 01273 236 236

QUICK LINKS:

Compliance and due diligence

Agency MOT

Legal services for recruitment agencies

Consultant Manager®

Back to the top
Printer friendly version