Recruitment Consultancies
ASDA deal not model solution
ARC challenges AWR
Social Media Networking as a tool
Employment status case law update
Umbrella problems damage reputation
Umbrella Company Problems
Limited companies within AWD Regulations
ARC reports on the Agency Workers Directive Part 2
Company opt outs to be retained - 12/11/09
ARC wins gold plating argument
2nd Consultation is Published - First impressions
Delay to Agency Workers Directive a welcome first
Fines imposed for Anti-Competitive activities
HMRC announces clampdown on expenses - 05/10/2009
Departing employees? - protecting client relations
“Vulnerable” Workers Helpline
Periods of sick leave and annual leave coinciding
Can you supply to replace workers on strike?
'Last in first out' redundancies
Need for a forensic approach to the AWD
Brown bows to union pressure at the TUC conference
HR set to hire direct - 16/09/2009
Seminar - Agency Workers Directive Second Consulta
Holiday pay decision
Planned increased in the national minimum wage
Employment status
ARC membership quadruples with legislation message
Construction industry
Swine flu and sickness absence
AWD threatens temp to perm fees
Government massively gold plating AWD says IoD and
More on the Agency Workers Directive
ARC exposes Agency Worker Directive.
ARC takes lead on Agency Workers Directive
Lawspeed to hold seminars on the AWD
Lawspeed seminar - Agency Workers Directive First
Consultation on Agency Workers Directive published
Lawspeed launches membership organisation
Government announces consultation - March '09
European Parliament votes to get rid of opt-out -
Pre budget report allows employment umbrellas off
Formation of Representative Group - expenses consu
Government announces yet more measures - this time
Agency Workers Directive - sleepwalk to disaster?
EU Council reaches agreement on principles of Agen
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights - May '08
Employment status and increased rights for agency
Changes to Conduct Regulations & Agency Standards
Case partially clarifies agency worker employment
HMRC Drops MSC Audit Scheme - December '07
Who could be an MSCP? - December '07
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights
HMRC has clarified its current position in relatio
MSC approval schemes update - September '07
MSC Legislation - Further Guidance - September 07
MSC Legislation - Finance Bill Passed - August '07
MSC Legislation Update. May '07
Budget Note - MSC Legislation Changes March '07
08/02/07 - 3rd party debt provisions released
Lawspeed meets Treasury re: MSC Consultation - Jan
Government announces consultation "Tackling Manage
HMRC announces start of a review of the concession
Extending paid holiday entitlement. July '06
Good news on employment status. May '06
Employment Status - Cable & Wireless Court of App
Employment status – where are we now? October '05
When is an agency worker an employee? July '05
Cable & Wireless v Muscat – Agency Clients Respond
End User held to be the employer of agency worker
Brook Street case opens door for tribunal claims J
New EAT case poses danger February '03
DTI's employment status review
EU agency workers directive
Working time and holiday pay
Risk management and insurance
Employment rights for contractors
Agency regulations - the way forward
Press > Recruitment Consultancies

HMRC Drops MSC Audit Scheme - December '07

Printer friendly version

MSC audit scheme - 12th December 2007

Following representations put forward by Lawspeed, HMRC and the Treasury has abandoned the idea of introducing an audit scheme in the foreseeable future.

In recent months HMRC had announced that it was considering a scheme which may allow for certain third parties to assess whether a provider organisation is compliant with the MSC legislation. However it had held back from making a quick decision despite pressure from various quarters to do so.

In announcing its decision not to proceed for now, HMRC has said that it will discuss the impact with external stakeholders.

Adrian Marlowe of Lawspeed said “This is a tremendous result both for umbrella companies and recruitment agencies. So far as umbrellas are concerned there were elements of the scheme that appeared to give an advantage to various providers in an unfair, and, some would say, unnecessary way. Also there were serious questions about the legality of any scheme for a number of different reasons, some technical and some practical. With regard to agencies in reality the only advantage of an audit scheme would be to guarantee that they are not liable for MSC contractor tax if they refer or recommend to an audited provider. Since HMRC could not agree to that for legal reasons, the idea of an audit scheme was always going to be of doubtful benefit. In addition an audit scheme had the potential to confuse agencies and limit the market.”

Adrian went on to say “in fact HMRC has issued some helpful guidance that agencies can rely upon. Where a contractor’s company already exists at registration with an agency, the agency is unlikely to be liable if the company turns out to be an MSC. Also an agency cannot be liable if it recommends a candidate to an umbrella company that pays only by way of employment income." In all other circumstances agencies should take care not to refer or recommend and should seek advice if in doubt.

With only a few weeks to run before agencies could become liable for MSC tax (6th January 2008) this issue does require urgent attention by those who may have been relying upon the emergence of an audit scheme and who otherwise have done little to prepare.

Lawspeed is involved in setting up membership trade body to represent the interests of umbrella companies and to operate as a flag for quality umbrella providers. For more information or to join please call Adrian Marlowe, Ravi Murphy or David Vincent on 01273 236236.

Back to the top
Printer friendly version