Recruitment Consultancies
ASDA deal not model solution
ARC challenges AWR
Social Media Networking as a tool
Employment status case law update
Umbrella problems damage reputation
Umbrella Company Problems
Limited companies within AWD Regulations
ARC reports on the Agency Workers Directive Part 2
Company opt outs to be retained - 12/11/09
ARC wins gold plating argument
2nd Consultation is Published - First impressions
Delay to Agency Workers Directive a welcome first
Fines imposed for Anti-Competitive activities
HMRC announces clampdown on expenses - 05/10/2009
Departing employees? - protecting client relations
“Vulnerable” Workers Helpline
Periods of sick leave and annual leave coinciding
Can you supply to replace workers on strike?
'Last in first out' redundancies
Need for a forensic approach to the AWD
Brown bows to union pressure at the TUC conference
HR set to hire direct - 16/09/2009
Seminar - Agency Workers Directive Second Consulta
Holiday pay decision
Planned increased in the national minimum wage
Employment status
ARC membership quadruples with legislation message
Construction industry
Swine flu and sickness absence
AWD threatens temp to perm fees
Government massively gold plating AWD says IoD and
More on the Agency Workers Directive
ARC exposes Agency Worker Directive.
ARC takes lead on Agency Workers Directive
Lawspeed to hold seminars on the AWD
Lawspeed seminar - Agency Workers Directive First
Consultation on Agency Workers Directive published
Lawspeed launches membership organisation
Government announces consultation - March '09
European Parliament votes to get rid of opt-out -
Pre budget report allows employment umbrellas off
Formation of Representative Group - expenses consu
Government announces yet more measures - this time
Agency Workers Directive - sleepwalk to disaster?
EU Council reaches agreement on principles of Agen
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights - May '08
Employment status and increased rights for agency
Changes to Conduct Regulations & Agency Standards
Case partially clarifies agency worker employment
HMRC Drops MSC Audit Scheme - December '07
Who could be an MSCP? - December '07
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights
HMRC has clarified its current position in relatio
MSC approval schemes update - September '07
MSC Legislation - Further Guidance - September 07
MSC Legislation - Finance Bill Passed - August '07
MSC Legislation Update. May '07
Budget Note - MSC Legislation Changes March '07
08/02/07 - 3rd party debt provisions released
Lawspeed meets Treasury re: MSC Consultation - Jan
Government announces consultation "Tackling Manage
HMRC announces start of a review of the concession
Extending paid holiday entitlement. July '06
Good news on employment status. May '06
Employment Status - Cable & Wireless Court of App
Employment status – where are we now? October '05
When is an agency worker an employee? July '05
Cable & Wireless v Muscat – Agency Clients Respond
End User held to be the employer of agency worker
Brook Street case opens door for tribunal claims J
New EAT case poses danger February '03
DTI's employment status review
EU agency workers directive
Working time and holiday pay
Risk management and insurance
Employment rights for contractors
Agency regulations - the way forward
Press > Recruitment Consultancies

Limited companies within AWD Regulations

Printer friendly version

05/02/2010 

The much anticipated Agency Workers Regulations 2010 were laid before parliament in January. The regulations are intended to give agency workers equal entitlement to pay and leave arrangements as if they had been recruited directly by their hirer, following an EU Directive finalised in December 2008. The Regulations are due to be adapted into law by March 2010 with application from October 2011.

The good news is that the proposal to introduce a reasonableness test for charging of transfer fees has been dropped. Adrian Marlowe, MD of Lawspeed and chairman of the Association of Recruitment Consultancies (ARC), said “We saw this recruiter specific proposal as highly dangerous for the temp contracting industry, leading to a potential blood bath as hirers switch workers from one agency to another, and we mounted a detailed and well publicised campaign to stop it. I am therefore very pleased to see that the Government statement indicates plans to drop the test in any form and to scrap the proposal leaving the transfer fees regulations unaffected.”

However, contrary to some reports, it appears that limited company contractors are not strictly excluded. In fact the Government response document makes it clear that the idea of exclusion for those operating through limited companies was rejected, and this is reflected in the Regulations. Instead the government provides an exception for those running their own business of which the hirer is a customer. This is of course quite distinct from the simple personal service company model.

Adrian Marlowe said “we are working our way through these regulations, which are complicated. Anyone seeking advice on what to do should not rush to any early conclusions since the application of the current form of the regulations may well depend on the election result. I understand the Conservatives have vowed to revisit them if they get in. However agencies should certainly be talking about these issues with their clients and Lawspeed can help in this area.”

Lawspeed will be working on effective solutions in due course. Watch this space for further details.

Quick links:

Back to the top
Printer friendly version