Recruitment Consultancies
ASDA deal not model solution
ARC challenges AWR
Social Media Networking as a tool
Employment status case law update
Umbrella problems damage reputation
Umbrella Company Problems
Limited companies within AWD Regulations
ARC reports on the Agency Workers Directive Part 2
Company opt outs to be retained - 12/11/09
ARC wins gold plating argument
2nd Consultation is Published - First impressions
Delay to Agency Workers Directive a welcome first
Fines imposed for Anti-Competitive activities
HMRC announces clampdown on expenses - 05/10/2009
Departing employees? - protecting client relations
“Vulnerable” Workers Helpline
Periods of sick leave and annual leave coinciding
Can you supply to replace workers on strike?
'Last in first out' redundancies
Need for a forensic approach to the AWD
Brown bows to union pressure at the TUC conference
HR set to hire direct - 16/09/2009
Seminar - Agency Workers Directive Second Consulta
Holiday pay decision
Planned increased in the national minimum wage
Employment status
ARC membership quadruples with legislation message
Construction industry
Swine flu and sickness absence
AWD threatens temp to perm fees
Government massively gold plating AWD says IoD and
More on the Agency Workers Directive
ARC exposes Agency Worker Directive.
ARC takes lead on Agency Workers Directive
Lawspeed to hold seminars on the AWD
Lawspeed seminar - Agency Workers Directive First
Consultation on Agency Workers Directive published
Lawspeed launches membership organisation
Government announces consultation - March '09
European Parliament votes to get rid of opt-out -
Pre budget report allows employment umbrellas off
Formation of Representative Group - expenses consu
Government announces yet more measures - this time
Agency Workers Directive - sleepwalk to disaster?
EU Council reaches agreement on principles of Agen
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights - May '08
Employment status and increased rights for agency
Changes to Conduct Regulations & Agency Standards
Case partially clarifies agency worker employment
HMRC Drops MSC Audit Scheme - December '07
Who could be an MSCP? - December '07
Agency Workers to get Employment Rights
HMRC has clarified its current position in relatio
MSC approval schemes update - September '07
MSC Legislation - Further Guidance - September 07
MSC Legislation - Finance Bill Passed - August '07
MSC Legislation Update. May '07
Budget Note - MSC Legislation Changes March '07
08/02/07 - 3rd party debt provisions released
Lawspeed meets Treasury re: MSC Consultation - Jan
Government announces consultation "Tackling Manage
HMRC announces start of a review of the concession
Extending paid holiday entitlement. July '06
Good news on employment status. May '06
Employment Status - Cable & Wireless Court of App
Employment status – where are we now? October '05
When is an agency worker an employee? July '05
Cable & Wireless v Muscat – Agency Clients Respond
End User held to be the employer of agency worker
Brook Street case opens door for tribunal claims J
New EAT case poses danger February '03
DTI's employment status review
EU agency workers directive
Working time and holiday pay
Risk management and insurance
Employment rights for contractors
Agency regulations - the way forward
Press > Recruitment Consultancies

When is an agency worker an employee? July '05

Printer friendly version

July '05

The issue of employment status is rapidly becoming a minefield for recruitment agencies and their clients.  Failure to keep up to speed with the constantly changing legal position can prove very costly.

In Cable & Wireless v Muscat, for example, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an agency worker was an employee of the end user, despite the contract between the agency and worker stating otherwise.  There are further recent relevant cases that affect the position between an end user, agency and its worker.

These may pave the way for agency workers to claim full entitlement to employee rights and compensation – including unfair dismissal.  The decision raises some fundamental issues such as, are agency workers entitled to employment rights?  How will end users of agency workers respond?  How can recruiters protect existing business?

Central to the concept of agency work is the client’s need for flexibility, in particular the ability to hire and fire at a reduced notice and the risk of claims for unfair dismissal. Traditionally by using agency workers, end users have been able to achieve that flexibility. Furthermore, the Law Courts have supported the concept in case after case where an agency has supplied a worker to the client to work under the client’s direction and control.

The two features that have historically enabled the Courts and Tribunals to determine that neither the agency nor a client is the employer of an agency worker are that the client does not pay the worker, and the agency does not control the worker. This is in respect of those cases where the contract is a contract for services, and that the written contractual terms have been properly formulated and exclude an employment relationship. There has always been a risk that there may be employment if the contractual terms are badly drafted.

The view now taken by the Court of Appeal, and followed by both Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunals, appears to be that, despite the written contractual terms, there may still be a direct implied (i.e. not written) contract between the agency worker and the end user client. This can be evidenced by the actual working circumstances under which the worker provides his or her services to the end user.

This clearly exposes both end users and their agencies to risk of claims being made by disgruntled agency workers. The Courts also take the view now that even if a claim is made against an end user, the agency should also be included. Historically if a claim has been  made against one, the other has not been made a party.

So does this trend attack the entire concept of agency work? Some end users may think so, with consequences for those agencies that supply them. So what should agencies do to shore up this absolutely key service?

As things currently stand it has been left to the Courts effectively to determine policy in relation to the status of agency workers. This means that agencies and end users will have to fund the arguments in Court, at a not insignificant cost in terms of legal fees and management time.  There are few cases where a costs award can ever be achieved against an agency worker who brings what appears to be a spurious claim. If the end users and agencies consistently lose, one of the major advantages to doing business in the UK, the ability to use a flexible workforce, will have been lost. This fundamental outcome raises  concern that the government remains silent on the issue

Until the government does decide to stop the haemorrhage of time and money by legislating on the position, agencies and end users should work together to identify the issues and deal with them in advance. This must mean that both agency and end user recognise that an agency worker cannot be treated in the same way as a regular employee. In turn the arrangements between agency and end user and agency and worker should reflect this.

Of course agencies that take a considered approach in handling their agency workers, particularly upon termination, are likely to be rewarded by far fewer claims and greater end user confidence.

To be kept up to date with this and other current issues which have an effect on your company and industry register for Agencyzone, Lawspeed’s free newsletter service.

Back to the top
Printer friendly version