spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout

This page is no longer current. If you are not automatically redirected within 5 seconds,
please click here to visit our current pages.

spacer for layout
Working time and holiday pay
spacer for layout spacer for layout
spacer for layout spacer for layout spacer for layout
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
bullet point graphic
Employment Tribunals (ETs) have made heavy weather of the provisions in the Working Time Regulations (WTR) relating to holiday pay. No one doubts that workers are entitled to payment, and many agencies include a sum in respect of that pay with normal “wage” payments.

Conflicting results have arisen from applications to ETs, on the one hand indicating that inclusive payments are not legal, and on the other hand indicating they are. To the rescue comes the Court of Appeal, which has indicated that if the parties agree that pay includes holiday pay then it can be held to be a valid arrangement. The lesson from this is that you should not include payment for holidays within the normal pay rate unless you have the worker’s express agreement, or you want to run the risk of a claim.

However, this particular sea is murkier than first appears. A recent decision makes it clear that if you overpay an amount in respect of holidays you cannot recover the overpayment by deduction from future payments unless the worker consents.

In addition, a worker appears to be entitled to payment for any leave not taken in the leave year. This is despite the fact that the WTR states that a worker cannot carry leave not taken in one year over to the following year, and payments “in lieu” are not allowed except upon termination of the contract. This last decision appear to mean that a worker could work for 52 weeks of the year and still be entitled to a further 4 weeks holiday pay. In my book, this amounts to payment in lieu and counters the spirit of the Regulations by discouraging workers from taking holidays! It has also been decided that in certain circumstances a worker can claim sums due for years gone by, assuming an application is made within 3 months of the end of the last leave year.

Furthermore, it was recently held that a worker on long term sick leave is still entitled to paid holidays even though the worker was not entitled to contractual pay whilst sick! As if that is not enough, the EU’s recent complaint to the UK that it has failed to implement the Working Time Directive correctly, including in relation to holidays, means there are likely to be more regulations to come. As in Ireland, those regulations will probably include an obligation upon the employer to require the worker to take holidays – an impossible task?

Keep your hatches battened down and get your contracts right.

arrow to page top

Disclaimer- This article is for general guidance only and is not a substitute for professional advice where specific circumstances can be considered. Whereas the greatest of care is taken in providing this information, neither the author nor Lawspeed can accept any liability for any action taken or not taken in reliance upon the information provided in this article.

spacer for layout
© Copyright Lawspeed 2004 | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
bottom of special offer table
icon of telephone +44(0)1273 236 236 icon of computer for e-mailing info@lawspeed.com icon of fax +44(0)1273 236 232 icon of letter for postal mail 6-7 Dubarry House, Hove Park Villas, Hove, BN3 6AF

Lawspeed is a commercial and legal consultancy specialising in recruitment law, recruitment practice, employment law, employment practice, IR35, contract law and legal services for recruitment agencies, consultancies, contractors, agencies and businesses in the contracting and recruitment industries.recruitment law, recruitment practice, employment law, contract law, contract, contracts, recruitment contracts, recruitment contract, agency contract, agency contracts, consultancy contract, consultancy contracts, employment agency, employment agency contract, employment agency contracts, recruitment, advice, terms and conditions, contract recruitment, temp recruitment, temporary recruitment, recruitment of contractors, limited company contractors, freelancer, legal issues, recruitment consultancy, recruitment consultancies, agencies, agency, employment business, business, start up, start-up, small business, personal service company, freelancers, small company, self employed status, self employed worker, self employment, employment status, status, tax status, legal advice, employment advice, contract advice, terms of business, permanent terms, paye workers, temps, temporary workers, temp status, agency worker, ir35, IR35, ir 35, finance act, substitution, mutuality of obligation, IR35 insurance, business insurance, professional indemnity, contractor support, contractor accountant, IR35 accountant, s660, section 660, composite company, umbrella company, UK contractor, UK accountant, inland revenue, revenue, ir35 legislation, case law, contract negotiation, ir35 tax, ir35 contract review, ir35 solution, IR35 advice, ir35 contract, ir35 proof contract, Interim management, interim manager, interim management advice, commercial review, commercial advice, commercial contract